On February 19, 2013, the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) received official notice from Customs and Border Protection (Agency) regarding the Agency’s proposed sequestration plan. The Agency intends to implement these plans if Congress does not do what is necessary to avoid sequestration. Included with this message is a copy of the notice that details the proposed cuts for the Office of Border Patrol (OBP), Office of Field Operations (OFO) and Office of Air and Marine (OAM). Some of the cuts outlined in the notice include: decertification of administratively uncontrollable overtime (AUO), furloughs, a reduction of travel expenses, and assigning two agents to a vehicle.
While it is great to finally receive a notice from the Agency that
actually contains some information, the NBPC would like to address a
false statement that appears in the beginning of the notice. The
statement leads one to believe that the NBPC failed to respond to the
invitation to engage in discussions regarding fiscal uncertainty. This
statement is a blatant lie, and NBPC representatives are in possession
of email correspondence that proves it. Fortunately, when confronted
about their lie, the Agency agreed to retract this erroneous statement.
From
the onset of the possibility of sequestration, the NBPC actively and
consistently attempted to elicit information from the Agency in order to
properly inform and educate our members. In fact, as of 3:00 p.m. on
February 19, 2013, the Agency was still unable or intentionally refused
to release any information to the NBPC about the Agency’s plan for
sequestration.
On February 20, 2013, NBPC executive committee
members met with Agency officials and received the fiscal uncertainty
briefing. The Agency highlighted the plan but acknowledged how it may
change and is subject to Secretary Napolitano’s approval. As is
illustrated below, the discrepancy in pay cuts is shocking and
offensive:
1. The Agency budget for Salary and Expenses is
$8,169,959,000. The Agency needs to cut $558,257,000 from this figure.
Of this amount, approximately $5,915,000,000 is actual salary and
related benefits that are paid to all Agency employees (72.4% of the
total Salary and Expenses budget.)
2. The Agency’s proposed overtime cuts in each component are:
a. OAM: 2 million
b. OFO: 35 million
c. OBP: 248 million
3. Administrative furloughs will be mandatory for all Agency
employees. Administrative furlough days will be up to fourteen (14)
non-consecutive workdays throughout FY 2013.
4. There are several other categories where cuts will be made, some of those are:
a. Buildings and maintenance
b. Fleet management
c. Travel
d. Relocation
One
thing that should leap off of the page is the enormous disparity of
overtime cuts between the three components. The manpower figures for
OAM are unknown, fairly inconsequential to this argument, and therefore
will not be addressed. OFO and OBP have almost the same number of
employees, with OFO having a few hundred more. The Agency is mandated
by law to cut 6.4% from the aggregate Salaries and Expenses budget, from
which the Border Patrol appears to be picking up the lion’s share of
the tab (87% of the proposed cuts).
Naturally the NBPC inquired
about the disparity and nobody can or will tell us the real reason.
However, Bianca Warner, the Executive Director of Mission Support, was
nice enough to point out how she believes Border Patrol agents are
simply overpaid and confirmed how the Agency has been targeting AUO to
pay Agency bills for several years, regardless of sequestration. This is
rather unsettling considering Bianca Warner’s salary for 2011 was
$170,512.00.
The Agency has consistently attacked Border Patrol
agents for several years with pay reform proposals that have singled-out
Border Patrol agents for huge pay reductions. The intended purpose of
the proposals is to redistribute Border Patrol agent salaries to fund
OFO management salaries. The complete disdain for Border Patrol agents
needs to be addressed by the Agency and not encouraged as it has been in
the past.
For now, the drastic, proposed cuts are only necessary
if Congress does not act. In circumstances like this, the NBPC may
negotiate the impact and implementation of select topics that are
related to conditions of employment. In other words, not every topic is
considered negotiable. The NBPC cannot just say that we do not agree
with implementing furloughs, decertifying AUO, reducing the vehicle
fleet, rationing gas, reducing training, or assigning two agents to
vehicles. Instead, the NBPC can only try to mitigate the way these
measures are implemented through impact and implementation bargaining
and hopefully ensure they are implemented in a fair manner.
The
NBPC met with AFGE to request assistance on pressuring the Agency to
reconsider the decision to take such drastic and lopsided cuts from the
Border Patrol, which in turn makes the border less secure. We are in
the process of drawing up a form letter for members to use to
communicate with Congressional representatives. We will need all agents
to utilize this letter to contact their elected officials. Please keep
an eye on the NBPC website for further updates, when available.
For additional information regarding sequestration and administrative furloughs, please visit the following sites:
AFGE
OPM
Download an official copy of the Agency’s notice to the NBPC
Download an official copy of the Agency's notice to the National Treasury Employees Union
Download an official copy of this notice
HONOR OFO FIRST?
|
Police Officer Daryl Raetz was struck and killed by an SUV while making an arrest for DUI near the intersection of 51st Avenue and Cambridge Drive.
At approximately 3:30 am Officer... 
Deputy Sheriff Tim Causey died as the result of smoke inhalation he suffered on March 16th, 2013, after responding to a massive fire in the Windsor Green area.
The fire destroyed... 
